User talk:69.51.66.186

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roaring Twenties, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roaring Twenties was changed by 69.51.66.186 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862711 on 2012-02-25T22:21:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Michael McGlothlin. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SheepNotGoats (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fenn treasure has been reverted. Your edit here to Fenn treasure was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://westerndigs.blogspot.com/2013/04/forrest-fenns-hidden-treasure-poem.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
 * Hi, I wanted to let you know that blogs are not considered acceptable reliable sources on Wikipedia, so I have changed your references to reliable newspapers or journals whenever possible. Please don't add any more facts that are cited to blogs in the future. Thanks, SheepNotGoats (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding links to the Western Digs blog (the very fact that it's hosted at Blogspot makes it a blog). Please see WP:USERGENERATED, which is the guideline that governs the use of reliable sources. The only way a blog might be acceptable is if it's an notable organization's official blog, but even in those cases we try to avoid them if a better source can be found. If you still disagree, we can always take this to the reliable sources noticeboard, where they deal with this sort of thing all the time. SheepNotGoats (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, you should know that edit warring (repeatedly reverting another user's edits) is heavily frowned upon, and can result in your account being blocked from editing. SheepNotGoats (talk) 19:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)