User talk:69.74.46.146

November 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Indigenous peoples in Brazil— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Hi. You need to follow the manual of style much more closely. (Go to any other article to see how their lead is structured.) Because, urrently, your edits constitute vandalism, which you may be blocked from editing for without further warning. Thanks. El_C 08:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Last chance. El_C 09:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 7 World Trade Center. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a home for conspiracy theories - please stop. David J Johnson (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 183.171.182.241 (talk) 07:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 183.171.182.224 (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. 115.164.215.121 (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. 115.164.58.52 (talk) 03:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. HunterM267 ❯  talk  19:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fred Phelps. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 07:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tammy Abraham, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm DB1729. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Sean McDermott have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DB1729 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (April 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:French_Revolutionary_and_Napoleonic_Wars Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:French_Revolutionary_and_Napoleonic_Wars reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Prairie Astronomer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Bobby Hebert, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Prairie Astronomer Contributions 22:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mauritius sheldgoose. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Din oz1  (chat?) (he/him) 15:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm The Night Watch. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Superbase—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Night Watch    (talk)   02:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)