User talk:69lol69

October 2013
Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Salesian College (Farnborough) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epicgenius (give him tirade • check out damage) 13:58, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nyjah Huston. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nyjah Huston was changed by 69lol69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963032 on 2013-10-14T14:02:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salesian College (Farnborough), you may be blocked from editing. Jackson Peebles (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User:Jackson Peebles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jackson Peebles (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer  Waters  05:32, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:69lol69


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:69lol69, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)