User talk:6runnerr

Draft Swift Playgrounds: {Advert|date=February 2019}
Hello 6runnerr,

You have tagged the article [Draft:Swift Playgrounds] with "contains content that is written like an advertisement". Could you please specify what you thing is wrong and give me a few guidelines how to correct it?

Thanks in advance, --Coel Jo (talk) 12:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello again,


 * I've improved the language of the article towards a more neutral tone. If you think is fine could you please remove the advert tag? if not please let me know what are your concerns.
 * Best regards, --Coel Jo (talk) 11:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 19:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, can you explain this further? I moved some articles that went against consensus at Village pump (policy)/Archive 159. I see you have reverted my changes, do you disagree with my reasoning? Thank you, 6runnerr (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You must let someone experienced handle this. Most of those drafts have serious issues and you are just moving them to main without addressing the issue. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 19:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, is there a place you would recommend reporting these then? I’m not sure I understand because these went against the policy by moving them to draft. My assumption is that there are other avenues to address the serious issues since moving to draft was not the way to do it according to the consensus. Those avenues should be decided by someone experienced once they are out of draft. Do you disagree? 6runnerr (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Reviewing AFC drafts
Hi ,

as I can't see your name at WP:AFC/P, please do not review AFC drafts for now.

Thanks and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. I wasn't reviewing any drafts, just moving the ones that were moved there in a way that went against the consensus at Village pump (policy)/Archive 159. I won't be reviewing any AFC drafts, thank you. 6runnerr (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah -- my point was: By moving them to mainspace, you accept them. Please don't yet, but do feel free to apply as a reviewer when the requirements are met. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message on my talk page. I agree with ToBeFree that you should hold off on moving pages out of draft space for now. Looking at the drafts you linked on my talk, moving them to mainspace was not the right decision. The consensus at Village pump (policy)/Archive 159 does not mean that you should go through draft space and reverse draftifications, especially if you are not an AFC reviewer. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification, I must have misunderstood that discussion, but I appreciate you taking the time. 6runnerr (talk) 21:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)