User talk:70.106.255.240

January 2016
Hello, I'm Natuur12. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thomas Aquinas has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Natuur12 (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Aquinas, you may be blocked from editing. Natuur12 (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Aquinas. Boomer Vial (talk) 07:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Thomas Aquinas with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —S MALL JIM   23:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You have been blocked for one month from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Antandrus (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked for three months from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- The Anome (talk) 17:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. ... richi (hello) 21:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Thomas Aquinas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RileyBugzYell at me &#124; Edits 22:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.