User talk:70.112.183.252

October 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at President of the Republic of China, you may be blocked from editing. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 20:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I believe you misused the template. Please elaborate on "deliberately introducing incorrect information"70.112.183.252 (talk) 20:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Blocks will keep getting longer
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

You seem to be arguing your block should be substantially extended, because you'd continue edit-warring in the future. Is this really the approach you wish to take here? --Yamla (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

I want to discuss the changes and I will not edit-war in the future. Can you ask him to explain his revert?
 * Is this the way you think you resolve disputes after reading WP:EW? --Yamla (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I will discuss on the talk page70.112.183.252 (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * What if they don't respond? --Yamla (talk) 22:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I am not sure, please advise, but I think they are supposed to discuss too.70.112.183.252 (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Please take the time to read our policies and guidelines. The expectations are clearly spelled out there. This block will give you plenty of time to read the policies and guidelines and avoid a substantially longer block in the future. --Yamla (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I can't find policies and guidelines about what to do when people don't respond.70.112.183.252 (talk) 02:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ^^The excuses for the WP:POINT disruption continue to weaken. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 16:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you please explain the reason of your revert?70.112.183.252 (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Longstanding consensus, even after the 2012 move of the baseline article Republic of China → Taiwan, to use the correct, formal name of the state, as the institution predates the KMT's retreat from the mainland. Stop these pointless replacements that you know have next to no chance of withstanding a legitimate discussion. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 23:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The full title of the position is still there, I added 'or the president of Taiwan' after it because it is how people usually call the position. The full title is not recognizable to many people so I think it is important to make it clear to the readers that the president of the Republic of China is what people call the president of Taiwan. It is currently in the note and many readers will not see it. 70.112.183.252 (talk) 23:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Wrong, besides disruptively switching the order, that was not the only major structural change made, you also did away with the "Republic of China (ROC), commonly known as Taiwan". There is no way that was unintentionally done. And the alternate name of the office, "President of Taiwan", was already in the footnote. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 23:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes that was the first change I made and after being reverted I changed to a compromise version. I do prefer the order switched because I think the more natural and recognizable name should come first. I would even like the article moved to "President of Taiwan". And after making it clear that Taiwan is Republic of China once in the title of the position, I think the rest of the article should use the commonly known name. As I said, "President of Taiwan" is currently in the footnote and many readers will not read the footnote.70.112.183.252 (talk) 23:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)