User talk:70.138.35.153

Corrections are needed. Why does the current article now have no information or discussion of the Bloomer-Dailey House which is a National Historic site? The only place the house is mentioned now is above the picture of the tree stump in the listing for the Balmville Tree. The article which used to discuss both the Balmville Tree and the Bloomer-Dailey House now only mentions the now removed tree or stump. The Wiki search function fails to find an article for the Bloomer-Dailey House alone although it does find the Balmville Tree with mention of the Bloomer-Dailey House. The house itself has a marker and therefore should be included in the list of historic places. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabmctx (talk • contribs) 19:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)