User talk:70.168.144.66

March 2016
Hello, I'm Peter SamFan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''However, your other work to the article was good. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be mean.'' Peter   Sam   Fan  22:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to University of California, Irvine, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 23:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at University of California, Irvine. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. James (talk/contribs) 23:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on University of California, Irvine. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. James (talk/contribs) 18:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Discussion at Talk:University of California, Irvine
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:University of California, Irvine. James (talk/contribs) 22:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at University of California, Irvine. James (talk/contribs) 19:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Blocked
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for resuming the same activity that resulted in the previous block. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of California, Irvine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying in your edit summary. You should have fixed the citation while you were at it. I just did so. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)