User talk:70.185.220.81

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (70.185.220.81) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. $(talk to me) (contributions)$ @ 17:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ridgeway Hill Viking burial pit. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Herod the Great does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 11:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Era changes
Please follow our guidelines at WP:ERA. I've reverted you as the article is a BCE article. Doug Weller talk 11:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Herod the Great, you may be blocked from editing. ''You were asked only a few days ago not to make era changes without a discussion following WP:ERA. '' Doug Weller  talk 11:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November with this edit. Jim1138 (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You've had previous warnings about these type of edits.

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to South-pointing chariot have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 06:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frige. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 06:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Augusto Pinochet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm Gluons12. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gerard Menuhin— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gluons12 talk 01:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Jillian Becker
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Jillian Becker article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nate Diaz— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 05:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bari Weiss. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beasting123 (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Monica P. Wallace have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
I’ve removed your edit to Jeff Rense, because it appeared to be based on a personal point of view rather than on reliable sources. Please see Verifiability. Mathglot (talk) 04:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Angels of Mons. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Katharina von Zimmern
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you!  CatcherStorm    talk   12:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Johand199. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Night Attack at Târgoviște—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Johand 199 (Talk • Contribs)  22:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annise Parker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. v/r - TP 16:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ludus Magnus, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Changing dates from AD to CE is not helpful since there's no easy way to be sure everything has been checked, and it's not a necessary change. See MOS:BCE'' RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Contributions to James Bainham
Hello, I reverted your edit on James Bainham. Are you aware that you edited a direct quote? You tried to place 'heretical', but the true text of the book is 'constant and undaunting'. In addition to not violating Wikipedia's rules on a Neutral Point of View, please do not commit acts of vandalism like this. kr0n05931 (talk) 17:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year to bring an end to your completely unresponsive, persistent addition of unsourced content for years, after numerous warnings and multiple blocks, without ever having engaged in discussion on any talk page, and without addressing any of the concerns voiced here. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.