User talk:70.209.198.29

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (70.209.198.29) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Dlthewave (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Dlthewave (talk) 04:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

You may not revert at Unite the Right more than one in 24 hours
See the notice on the talk page. You'll be blocked if you continue to revert. Doug Weller talk 05:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I've never reverted edits, only added information, but I get the point. I don't think people complaining about what "the far right" are trying to do should have any bearing on whether or not a particular detail which was not speculative in nature should be added to the page.  You shouldn't be backing political edits.  The excuse the first person gave when they reverted my edit was that Heyer's mother was "just speaking off the cuff".  How could they know that?  It's obvious that there's a particular narrative that they want to put forward. 70.209.198.29 (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You're right about not backing "political edits". You trying to add the detail about the heart attack is a political edit, and I don't back it. It's obvious that there's a particular narrative that you want to put forward. Rockypedia (talk) 09:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * What's political about someone dying of a heart attack? My narrative is the objective truth. 70.209.198.29 (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * See the article talk page about why no one believes your explanation of your "narrative". Thanks for editing. Good luck in your future endeavors, and bless your heart. Rockypedia (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)