User talk:70.24.177.165

Hello, I'm Moriwen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mace (spray) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Moriwen (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Moriwen,
 * I appreciate the time you take to try and inform me.
 * But actually it was the second time I removed the irrelevant reference.
 * The first time I simply marked "irrelevant", think that it was obviously a mistakenly added reference. The second time I've been a little more expedite.
 * I don't feel like trying to find my old account for Wikipedia.
 * However I proceeded to read the whole article on Elsevier and I can assure you, the article is about the spice mace, but no mention whatsoever is made about the fact that the aerosol irritant or the company is or isn't linked.
 * I believe that the inner link, in blue, to the Mace article provides enough disambiguation context for anybody; linking to the reference isn't relevant, in my opinion.
 * Now, if you really want to add the link to the reference, please go ahead, it's not like I'll need to read this article anytime soon.
 * Heck, even the text I just wrote is longer then it is.
 * I do not believe it was a sandbox use case.
 * Best regards,
 * Antoine Robitaille
 * montreal, quebec 70.24.177.165 (talk) 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)