User talk:70.24.86.150

May 2022
Hello, I'm TheoCourt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Gospel of James have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Theo (talk)  17:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Immaculate Conception into Sinlessness of Mary. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Papal primacy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your description was too vague, therefore I reverted your good faith edits. There are more sources removed than Doeswyck's 2 & your description of the "Romanism" source fails to single out a source. As per WP:BRD suggests, please discuss on the talk page before attempting this again. Also see WP:VNT.'' Peaceray (talk) 14:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. ''I am adding this because you seem to be a single-purpose account (<100 edits & >95% on subjects concerning Catholicism) that is editing anonymously yet seems surprisingly familiar with wikipedia policies & guidelines. I find this suspicious, & thought I would give you a chance to respond here first.'' Peaceray (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. I have no interest in creating an account. I am very comfortable editing from the comfort of not having to remember passwords. 70.24.86.150 (talk) 06:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Given that:
 * Modern browsers routinely can save a password.
 * Wikipedia allows one to stay logged in for as long as a year
 * If you supply your email address (which is kept private) Wikipedia will allow you to reset a password without knowing your current one.
 * I therefore find the comfort of not having to remember passwords to be an odd & unconvincing argument for not registering. Peaceray (talk) 05:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I guess I just like the comfort of being able to be a forgettable IP more? Also, I have no interest in convincing you in anything. I am a good editor on Wikipedia, in good standing. 70.24.86.150 (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)