User talk:70.27.56.72

May 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Issei—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 11:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I want to know why every article say that brazil is home the largest ethnic group outside that Asian country, why was not the United States when it first had the Japanese immigrants in the 1880s before brazil had them later in the 1900s which should be claimed to be the largest outside Japan in USA, also many Japanese people speak English and it be accurate if they said USA is home to the largest Japanese population outside Japan would be perfect sense? The United States had the Japanese, already many went there first was over 24 thousand something, already, brazil had hundreds when they first arrived, I saw in the 1940s said that brazil had 205,000 Japanese and USA has 285,000 Japanese on another article on wikipedia, but it is sad they didn't claim USA is the first Americas to receive Japanese immigrants and should be the one to say the largest Japanese population outside Japan of American nikkei right? Do you agree? Because I am sure that is right that US should make the one said the largest in the world outside Japan, because US had the Japanese before brazil did. Edit: When brazil receive the Japanese in the late 1900s, there were, already 24,326 Japanese in USA in the early 1900s so, this is why I believe USA is the one to host the largest then brazil did.

Edit 2: It has been a while and still no one replies to my questions, could someone reply me now, please as I am out of curiosity?