User talk:70.49.162.176

May 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Original Six, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Zim Zala Bim talk 01:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have twice provided that explanation. You need a reliable source to include that information. 70.49.162.176 (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Original Six, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have deleted the same material from the article five times. Four different editors have restored it, suggesting that consensus is to keep it. If you think it should be removed, make your argument on the article's talk page and do not edit war.'' MelanieN (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

3RR edit warring violation
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.   Ravenswing     01:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring at Original Six
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 03:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)