User talk:70.51.105.11

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
 * The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
 * The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
 * The ability to start new pages.
 * The ability to rename pages.
 * The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
 * The ability to upload images.
 * The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
 * The eligibility to become an administrator.
 * Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by  [ creating an account] . Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. -- Spinboy 05:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

I appreciate a lot of the work you've done, but showing the succession of nations isn't really what a secession box is designed for. It heavily simplifies stuff that should be explained in text, and it crowds the bottom of articles. If you want to add these, please discuss them on the article talk pages first. Thanks! --Golbez 03:39, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Kristin Kreuk's ethnic background!
Kristin Kreuk is not Chinese! In fact she isn't even close! She is half Chinese/Indonesian and half Dutch! She is eurasian. As much as people want to think she is Chinese but she is not. You have to admit that multiracial people don't have an identity..They just have to accept both of their races! I'm removing her under the category Chinese Canadian. (Kyla 19:19, 29 September 2005 (UTC))

The Honourable
You have added this link to the biographies of dozens of people who are not entitled to the style. Please stop. Provincial politicians, even premiers, are not generally entitled to the style unless they have been made privy councilors. Please go back and undo your changes where appropriate. Fawcett5 17:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC) Thanks for helping out with this! Cheers, Fawcett5 18:19, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Thomas Payne (architect)
A template has been added to the article Thomas Payne (architect), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Cruftbane 21:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alex Chum
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alex Chum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Fail to meet general notability guidelines at WP:BIO; article has no references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmundo (talk) 19:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wilfred Caplan
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wilfred Caplan. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Wilfred Caplan. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Canadian professional bodies
Category:Canadian professional bodies, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jason Leung


The article Jason Leung has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ENT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SFK2 (talk) 07:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susan Ip


The article Susan Ip has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 9 years."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 06:47, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Beatrice Politi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beatrice Politi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beatrice Politi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm Erpert. An edit that you recently made to Trey Songz discography seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 13:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

"Wilfred Caplan" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wilfred Caplan. Since you had some involvement with the Wilfred Caplan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Ferragine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Ferragine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Frank Ferragine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)