User talk:70.51.145.105

You ask for the source. The source is the Wikipedia page, referencing the 2016 version of The Lighthouse, that was included in my original edit. Please click on that link. If you have not seen this film, I suggest you do before summarily removing my entry. If you have indeed seen the 2016 version, then I cannot see what you could possibly object to. The two films are obviously very similar in plotline. Please explain why you find it necessary to censor, repeatedly, a factual entry. 70.51.145.105 (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

original research
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. --SubSeven (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Lighthouse (2019 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.--Jockzain (talk) 19:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

A note
Also, looking at your reasoning above, I want to make clear that your 'source' is not sufficient. You need a source for the conclusion you are coming to. It is not sufficient to link to a plot, and say "look, it's similar!", you need to find an independent, reliable source that states that the two plots are similar. --SubSeven (talk) 07:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)