User talk:70.59.43.234

WP:3RR - do not edit war!
Please note that Wikipedia forbids edit-warring and in particular draws a sharp line at more than 3 reverts in any 24 hour period. You are over that limit. Please see WP:3RR and be aware that the policy will usually be enforced via blocking the infringing editor. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC) I only did two reverts, so why are you talking to me. Stop deleting my reverts because you, and your Green Party socks don't like reality. Your in denial of some of the worlds leading scientists synthesis reports. The article is about opinions, and lists synthesis reports. This is one of the top reports, yet you delete any opinions posted that contradicts yours.70.59.43.234 (talk) 18:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You might also profit from reading WP:NPA. As for counting: I find it hard to believe that two IPs, both from Denver, both from the same ISP, independently make the same edit. As for content: The so-called NIPCC is a front group for Heartland. It's report has no scientific merit. It's a piece of propaganda, not of scientific opinion. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I reverted two activist deletes, is that what are you talking about. Clearly a quick search, would tell you that the NIPCC report is consistent with those scientists published opinions. You can easily look up all of those scientists on Wiki, as that other editor noted. That would confirm the NIPCC report is inline with their opinions, thus not propaganda about their opinions. Your view that it has no scientific merit is your opinion. I'm sure the significant scientific achievements of the reports authors, guarantee they have merit.70.59.43.234 (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

DS alert climate change
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)