User talk:70.80.99.68

April 2018
Hello. Your recent edit to Leaside High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lawrence Park Collegiate Institute, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Well, if she won the Nobel I'm sure you'll be able to provide reliable sources for that claim. Meters (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Martel affair, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ''Your edits are not explained, as required, have in some cases poor English and contain numerous typo's. Please refer Wikipedia guidelines and stop making unnecessary edit. Thank you.'' David J Johnson (talk) 08:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Topican (talk) 02:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Respectfully yours, KevCor360 (lets talk) 01:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Supreme court. Respectfully yours, KevCor360 (lets talk) 01:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Samuel Lyde—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)