User talk:70.87.15.130

Policy
"Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages without replying (if a reply would be appropriate or polite) will probably be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings. Redirecting your user talk page to another page (whether meant as a joke or intended to be offensive or to send a "go away" message), except in the case of redirecting from one account to another when both are yours, can also be considered a hostile act."

This is an excerpt from the policy you sent. Those pages which I have reinstated are ones to which a discussion had ensued and not been met. One user had erased a dispute without even responding. I have spoken to various people on this matter, including several top administrators; when I first joined, I was unaware of the policy of blanking, which I was informed is a rule applying even to one's own talk page unless the message sent is harassing, pointless, or offensive in some capacity. I am going to revert what you erased on the talk page of an IP address. That person (who it is, I do not know) blanked another user's talk page. That most certainly is prohibited.
 * Yes, that would be fine. So you know, though, it's difficult to actually tell when something is vandalism at times.  That's often been a flaw-people either see things one way or the other.  If the person is warned, though, they just need to explain to the person who posted the warning; sometimes, the intent is malicious and the person may not be as willing to back down (having a desire to play some sort of joke or harm Wikipedia), though, and in that case, it is vandalism.

Midori
You've been asked repeatedly by an admin to stop adding uncited information to this article. It's going to be reverted each time you do it, and you could be blocked, so knock it off. Ckessler 03:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.  K i ll fe s t 2  04:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You can archive them, but not remove them.  K i ll fe s t 2  04:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Read this link to learn how to archive talk pages.  K i ll fe s t 2  04:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

"Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. However, after a reasonable time has elapsed, archiving one's talk page, including the vandal warning, is acceptable. Editors may be subject to a minor block for archiving prematurely so as to hide warnings." Ckessler 04:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * "The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally discouraged/prohibited [1] from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors. "


 * You are trying to mislead people who view this from thinking you have not vandalised in the past by adding uncitable material, which isn't the case. If you delete these warnings one more time, you will be reported to AIV for an immediate block.  K i ll fe s t 2  04:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, just to make it formal...:

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again.  K i ll fe s t 2  04:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against personal attacks, disruption, trolling. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Note to sysops&#58; Unblocking yourself should almost never'' be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.'' abakharev 05:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)