User talk:71.10.171.117

September 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lorentz transformation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 08:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Erdős–Bacon number, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

@Sundayclose Maybe you should check the already poor citations on that page first.71.10.171.117 (talk) 01:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * A couple of responses. First, "other crap exists" is not an excuse for adding more crap. You added an item that was not properly cited to a reliable source and tried to justify a Bacon number based on an unverifiable uncredited extra. Did you know that I've been an extra in all of Bacon's films, and that can be verified on my personal website where I make the claim? If you don't believe me, that's the reason I don't believe you. Poor or absent sourcing is sufficient for its removal and the above warning. Secondly, rather than trying to justify your bad edit by making a vague complaint that there is other bad sourcing, why don't you actually try to improve the article by pointing out where there is insufficient sourcing and explain why. But do it on the article's talk page rather than here or my talk page so the entire Wikipedia community can see it. Sundayclose (talk) 03:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate your detailed response. Thank you for upholding Wikipedia.