User talk:71.11.10.50

November 2020
Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Birth defect—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 13:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pseudomyrmex ferruginea—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm WindTempos. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to SpaceX—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. WindTempos (talk • contribs) 11:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at O'dell Owens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skylar130 (talk) 14:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dawaf (November 8)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dawaf Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheAafi was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: nonsense

─ The Aafī   (talk)  18:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dawaf


The page Draft:Dawaf has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 15:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gary Paulsen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Paulsen. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gary Paulsen was changed by 71.11.10.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919721 on 2024-01-11T12:42:17+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gary Paulsen, you may be blocked from editing. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gary Paulsen. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm Ternera. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Strange Fruit—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Arctic fox, you may be blocked from editing. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Plattsburgh, New York, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anglican Communion, you may be blocked from editing. CCWikiMan (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)