User talk:71.114.13.203

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Laz Díaz, you may be blocked from editing. L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 14:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Not sure how using an accurate term for a strike-breaker is disruptive editing.
 * First, according to the link you provided, disruptive has to be repetitive. But I don't want to rest on that minor technicality.
 * The larger issue is the legitimacy of what I posted. I added a one-word descriptor, favored by the labor side of the capital/labor dichotomy. Unfortunately, it is a dichotomy - you can only use, or not use, the term for a person who replaces a unionized worker during a labor dispute. By refusing to use the term "scab", you are siding with capital.
 * I suppose we could use the wikipedia term "strikebreaker", but if we're going to be objective, we have to admit that term dispossesses itself of a lot of connotation.
 * Anyway, intent was to present a fair and accurate portrayal of how Laz Diaz got his job in a way that "everyone gets". I would think that upholds the higher ideals of wikipedia. 71.114.13.203 (talk) 16:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)