User talk:71.120.15.50

February 2018
Hello, I'm HanotLo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alfredo Bowman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. HanotLo (talk) 15:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alfredo Bowman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HanotLo (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alfredo Bowman, you may be blocked from editing. HanotLo (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alfredo Bowman. HanotLo (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

A few comments
Here are a few comments relating to the editing you have been doing recently.
 * The word "quack" means a person who claims to be, or practices as, a doctor, despite not being medically qualified. That is precisely what Alfredo Bowman was, so there is nothing "inaccurate" or "improper" about using the word. It is true that some people have used the word loosely, but that is a different matter. You also refer to what you call "ridiculous colloquial use of 'quack'", but in fact the word is not used in that article in a colloquial way: it is used quite literally in its formal meaning.
 * AIDS denialism is claiming either that AIDS doesn't exist or that it exists but is not caused by HIV. Unless you can provide reliable sources that show that the sources purporting to show that Alfredo Bowman did that are invalid, you should not remove mention of the fact that Bowman did promote such denials.
 * Repeatedly making the same, or substantially the same, edits after others have reverted them, known as edit warring, is considered disruptive. If you disagree with other editors you should explain why on a talk page and be prepared to discuss the issues with a view to trying to establish agreement, rather than simply repeatedly restoring the version that you prefer. If everyone did that, eventually most people would give up, meaning that the most stubborn person would get his or her way, which would not be a good way of settling disagreements. An editor who persists in edit warring may be blocked from editing by an administrator, to prevent such disruption.
 * Wikipedia has a policy that editors must not make personal attacks. Please don't continue to refer to other editors in such terms a "no-life-having trolls". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)