User talk:71.14.79.236

Welcome!
Hello, 71.14.79.236, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutralitytalk 19:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neutralitytalk 19:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Russian hacking
I refer you to the myriad references at this article: Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

To quickly find some good sources, search that article for these words: "hacked the servers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". You'll find them there. The only people who deny that Russia hacked those emails are Putin, Trump (an admission would weaken his claim that he did not steal the election with help from Russia), and those "deplorables" who believe them. They only feed on fake news (not what Trump calls "fake news)), so they're constantly being mislead and lied to. Such editors have no credibility here because they believe unreliable sources. Here we depend on using only reliable sources. To find out who hacked the emails, and who paid the hackers, read pages 34-35. That will help you understand why Trump and his people knew about the hacking before anyone else. -- BullRangifer (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack. -- BullRangifer (talk) 20:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Meters (talk) 08:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak
Your recent editing history at 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- BullRangifer (talk) 19:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm GreenMeansGo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scientific opinion on climate change have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. G M G talk   08:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.