User talk:71.163.7.41

Rail accidents
Hi! Please stop including the following type of accidents: I'd suggest you take a look at what Wikipedia is not, as well. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Routine level crossing accidents with few injuries or deaths (say, if the total number of casualties is below 5, there's a near 100% chance it shouldn't go in)
 * 2) Inconsequential minor derailments (yes, trains occasionally derail, but unless something significant happened as a result of that derailment - such as significant injuries or material damage - then it shouldn't go in)
 * 3) Any event whose only source is local news (as this strongly suggests the event in question is, in fact, not that significant)
 * 4) Any event where the only sources are tabloids or otherwise of dubious reliability or outright unreliable
 * Simply because an event happens in a railway station does not make it a rail accident. A rail accident should, minimally, involve a rail vehicle (such as a train) as a material factor in the incident, not just happen to occur near or in one... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of rail accidents (1950–1959), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Blogs are not reliable sources RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of rail accidents (1950–1959), you may be blocked from editing. A picture by a random person on the internet, with a self-provided description, is not a reliable source either. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.


 * Blocked for 1 week. This is unacceptable. A news report about a level crossing accident in Canada being used to support an accident in the United States. Other editors have noticed your poor English, and it is being questioned as to whether you have the competence to edit Wikipedia. Mjroots (talk) 05:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)