User talk:71.164.0.121

Fahrenheit 9/11
I have included a filibuster in lieu to the previous statement that you made on the talk page but you have made no response and continue to remove "documentary" from the text. Unless you can provide an actual source (not an anti-Moore website or a message board) and complementing that, a neutral source that says that (depending on what is purported to be lied about) cancels out its status as a documentary, then we might consider removing it. We don't rely on circumstantial evidence, just because the film is controversial. Do not remove it again unless consensus for you to do so is cleared. Reginmund 02:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You appear to continue reverting the restoration of the NPOV. I have already warned you. Remove it once more and I will report you. Reginmund 02:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Consensus is the agreement between two or more individual users either stemming from or to prevent a dispute. You still haven't provided a filibuster to my response, nor have actually presented facts against this film's documentary classification and are engaging in an edit war. I strongly suggest that you stop editing the article and discuss this matter at the talk page. If you continue to revert my edits on the page, I will report you to an administrator who may have you blocked from editing. Reginmund 02:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't expect me to go on a wild goose chase looking for evidence that the film is not a documentary. I do not know what sources you are using to prove your point, therefore I cannot and will not be your barrister, especially for something that I oppose. I will not spark discussion about this film's status as a documentary unless you provide a filibuster on the talk page and cease this disruptive edit war. In light of you ignoring the persistent warnings and request I have given you to settle this on the talk page, I have had you reported to an administrator for disruption. If you want to prove your point, take it to the discussion page and make a rebuttal to my statement because it is the only place on Wikipedia where I will argue my point. Reginmund 03:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You still have not responded to my filibuster on the Fahrenheit 9/11 talk page. I am not responsible for enforcing your opinions, as I am not your barrister, especially when I oppose your point. Yes, that is a wild goose chase and I'm not prepared to go on with it. If you have a point, give me your direct sources on it (and Wikipedia itself doesn't count since it is a wiki). Please refer this discussion to the Fahrenheit 9/11 talk page so other editors may express their opinions about it, thus making this matter less obscure. My "being against" you actions have already been instated on the articles talk page. Do not assume otherwise, especially since you haven't made a rebuttal to it since I last edited it. I would warn you about assuming that my political bias is a factor in this debate as it is considered a personal attack as the guideline states a form of personal attack as:

Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views -- regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream or extreme.


 * I warn you once, do not use this tactic to defend your point of view. I do not interpret my personal affiliations to the articles' content as it is against Wikipedia's policy. In condolences to your concern as to whether or not this film is inappropriately labeled, that is a matter that I have already insinuated that we take to the article's talk page. Please bring this debate where I left off on the discussion page as it is where it belongs. Reginmund 04:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think that you understand the rules on this encyclopaedia (given by the fact that you don't even have an account). If you do break a rule, you may be subject to warnings, reports, blockings, etc.. Regarding the rules that you have broken, I would not hesitate to take action against them. If you feel that I have broken one myself, feel free to comment on it. Otherwise, if you ever make personal attacks towards me or start another edit war again, I will not hesitate to report your incivil behaviour. As for all of your filibusters, you do not need to post them on my talk page. The Fahrenheit 9/11 discussion page will do. Reginmund 05:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. see WP:3RR. Carlossuarez46 05:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)