User talk:71.172.6.213

July 2021
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Higher Love, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 22:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to How Can We Be Lovers?, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Higher Love. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Higher Love. Binksternet (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Higher Love. Binksternet (talk) 23:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Springfield (The Simpsons)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 747pilot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The Simpsons house have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 747pilot (talk) 02:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Springfield (The Simpsons). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Higher Love. Binksternet (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)