User talk:71.183.121.49

April 2020
Hello, I'm Gaelan. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Michael Rectenwald seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaelan 💬✏️ 04:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Michael Rectenwald—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Michael Rectenwald
Hi 71.183.121.49, your edits have been reverted several times by various editors. Per WP:BRD the onus is on you to start a discussion on the article's talk page in order to gain consensus for your proposed changes. See WP:TP for guidance on using talk pages. S0091 (talk) 21:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello 71.183.121.49, this is your first warning for this edit. --Serols (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Michael Rectenwald, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nyook  ✉ 18:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Rectenwald. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 23:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mises Institute has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mises Institute was changed by 71.183.121.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878879 on 2020-10-28T11:43:02+00:00

November 2020
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mark Crispin Miller—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Michael Rectenwald has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael Rectenwald was changed by 71.183.121.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88613 on 2020-12-21T10:11:11+00:00

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rachel Fulton Brown have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rachel Fulton Brown was changed by 71.183.121.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88341 on 2021-01-10T00:26:08+00:00

May 2021
Hello, I'm Mikehawk10. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Michael Rectenwald, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Michael Rectenwald have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael Rectenwald was changed by 71.183.121.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882071 on 2021-08-13T22:23:43+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Smuckers It has to be good|undefined 22:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Rectenwald. Helen (💬📖) 22:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Michael Rectenwald have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael Rectenwald was changed by 71.183.121.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874836 on 2021-09-15T23:16:10+00:00

Michael Rectenwald - guidance
Please read Wikipedia's biographies of living people carefully along with the neutral point of view policy. Please take concerns along with any relevant sources that support those concerns (if applicable) to either the the BLP noticeboard or the Teahouse, rather than editing the article directly. As you know, editing the article has not been successful. S0091 (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2021 (UTC)