User talk:71.184.206.176

October 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Cordero. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 21:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Kloots, you may be blocked from editing. TwoTwoHello (talk) 21:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Annie Glenn. TwoTwoHello (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Cordero. Daniuu (talk) 21:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Formula One World Championship.   Robertjamal12   (talk)  00:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Andover, Massachusetts—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andover Public Schools (Massachusetts), you may be blocked from editing. Equine-man (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andover, Massachusetts. Equine-man (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 22:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —El Millo (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. Your recent edit(s) to the page Luca (2021 film) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kimi Räikkönen. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — SirDot (talk) 12:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, you may be blocked from editing. —El Millo (talk) 14:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm P.greenlink. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ghostbusters: Afterlife have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. P.greenlink (talk) 13:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ghostbusters: Afterlife, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. P.greenlink (talk) 23:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ghostbusters: Afterlife shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chip3004 (talk) 23:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Chip3004 (talk) 23:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.