User talk:71.187.145.122

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Townshend Acts, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Battle of Trenton, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gypsum. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Orson Scott Card, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Orson Scott Card was changed by 71.187.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953249 on 2011-11-03T14:34:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Isaac Newton's religious views, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=473183705 here]. Wiki13 (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: McCulloch v. Maryland was changed by 71.187.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963144 on 2013-01-11T17:21:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meriwether Lewis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Meriwether Lewis was changed by 71.187.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96648 on 2013-01-11T17:24:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Demize. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to United States presidential election, 1856, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, demize  (t · c) 14:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to United States presidential election, 1856 has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. demize (t · c) 14:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Phoenicia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Solomon because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Richard Winters has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Richard Winters was changed by 71.187.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954504 on 2016-01-13T14:51:01+00:00.

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gopher has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gopher was changed by 71.187.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854702 on 2016-10-03T12:53:24+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Naked mole-rat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Naked mole-rat was changed by 71.187.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944594 on 2016-10-03T14:44:24+00:00.

January 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Florence Harding—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)