User talk:71.193.148.7

December 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Skunk Fu! have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Skunk Fu! was changed by 71.193.148.7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886124 on 2021-12-05T21:02:38+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Super Mario World (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Women of Reform Judaism, you may be blocked from editing. ♥ Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) ♥ 21:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Skunk Fu! Why?
Hi,

You seem like an energetic and creative person. May I ask why you're wasting your talents with all these unhelpful edits to Skunk Fu!? Don't you think you could achieve more if you directed your energies in a more focused and productive way?

Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KidCartoonClassic.tv


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:KidCartoonClassic.tv, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. THE Pizzaplayer&#33; TALK TO MEE&#33;&#33; contribs 16:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Skunk Fu!, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Carrey filmography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 22:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

July 2022
Hello, I'm Jean-de-Nivelle. Your recent edit(s) to the page Tim Burton appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dragon Hunters (film), you may be blocked from editing. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 20:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Willem Dafoe filmography. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 07:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Charlie Day. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 07:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ryan Potter. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Super Mario Bros. (film). $chnauzer 23:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 00:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello! I'm Blaze Wolf. Your recent edit(s) to the page Super Mario Bros. (film) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Skunk Fu! again ...
Please don't start this again. It was amusing at first. It's just tedious now. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)