User talk:71.193.74.168

April 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dimebag Darrell, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 08:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Molecular physics. Serols (talk) 11:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Hello, I'm TheDoDahMan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chris Cornell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. TheDoDahMan (talk) 08:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

"Respectively"
Please read the definition of "respectively". You have used it incorrectly in numerous articles, creating ungrammatical sentences. Respectively: "Separately or individually and in the order already mentioned (used when enumerating two or more items or facts that refer back to a previous statement)". So it's correct to say that "spaghetti consists of a pasta, a sauce, and a meat. These are spaghetti noodles, tomato sauce, and meatballs, respectively". Notice that the previous sentence has items in a specific order, which is what makes "respectively" needed and appropriate. It is incorrect (and grossly ungrammatical) to say "Spaghetti consists of spaghetti, tomato sauce, and meatballs, respectively" as you did. Respective to what??? There is no previous order for "respectively" to refer to. Every instance of a series of items does not (and should not) use the word "respectively". If you can't understand this, simply stop using the word on Wikipedia because others have to clean up your mess. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. I have removed the word "respectively" from three more articles. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Merchant. Sundayclose (talk) 00:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Type O Negative—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)