User talk:71.218.13.215

December 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Gilliam (talk) 12:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

it was not my intention to violate that. As I have said if the block was lifted I would be a good contributor to Wikipedia. On top of that. There was NO Vandalism after the final warning so you see I obeyed that last warning and the administrator decided to still enforce the block
 * If it was truly not your intention to violate our policies, I'm afraid you should refrain from editing even when your 60 hour block expires. We require a certain amount of competency to edit here, and your edits demonstrated a distinct lack of that. --Yamla (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

So will you please lift the block?
 * I have no intention of doing so. The block is clearly appropriate. You were deliberately attacking Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 13:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

You are not permitted to blank any declines for your unblock requests, not for active blocks. You are welcome to remove your current block review request, though. Any further blanking or personal attacks and I'll revoke your access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 13:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Negative BLP content
Just so you know that adding negative BLP material that is not reliably sourced and that is couched in terms more befitting a tabloid will result in a lengthier block. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)