User talk:71.246.155.153

January - 2015
Your recent editing history at Hindu Kush shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Alfred the Great
You reverted my grammatical correction of the clause 'manuscripts burnt up along with the churches'. I have no object to the word 'burnt' as opposed to 'burned'. However, the phrase 'manuscripts burnt', without a separating comma, suggests that the verb is active, as in 'Tom burnt his brothers socks'. Here, the verb should be passive, as in 'manuscripts were burnt, along with the churches' [Note that the subordinate clause needs to be separated by a comma].

I do object to the word 'up' which is a colloquialism that has no logical meaning. Tom's brother's socks may have been burnt to ashes, burnt out, even; or burnt up in the attic; but 'burnt up' detracts from the meaning and significance of the word 'burnt'.

As you seem not to like other contributors emending your grammar, may I recommend that you yourself, add the active verb 'were', and change the sentence to include: 'manuscripts were burnt, along with the churches that housed them.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katbun (talk • contribs) 12:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)