User talk:71.57.35.130

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Both additions made conform to the criteria specified[0] as the prerequisite for a moral panic. If you have a concern with source reliability, please specify which sources are unreliable instead of making blanket modifications
 * [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moral_panic&diff=1123769349&oldid=1123764243#Cohen's_stages_of_moral_panic 71.57.35.130 (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Ponyo bons mots 18:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 20:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * As you have continued to edit war despite my warning, you are now blocked from the article for 72 hours. You are still able to participate at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard and/or to gain consensus for your contested edits at Talk:Moral panic. These are both discussions in which you should have engaged instead of edit warring to try to force your contentious material into the article.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)