User talk:711joel

Proposed deletion of "Upcoming neighbours plots"
The deletion of an article you created, Upcoming neighbours plots, has been proposed for the following reason:


 * The title itself says why this article should be deleted: the word "upcoming" is a surefire way to tell that this article violates WP:CRYSTAL.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 04:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "2009 neighbours plots"
A page you created, 2009 neighbours plots, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 05:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 2009 neighbours plots
A tag has been placed on 2009 neighbours plots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2009 neighbours plots
I have nominated 2009 neighbours plots, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/2009 neighbours plots. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Quantumobserver (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I have replied to you at the AFD discussion. Icewedge (talk) 07:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created, 2009_neighbours_plots maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/2009_neighbours_plots.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Please provide reliable sources
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also note that Wikipedia does not accept original research (i.e information you got from your neighbour or friends) or material which has not been published first by reliable sources such as newspapers, journals, etc. Thanks, Sarah 04:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia's Awesome Reviews
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia's Awesome Reviews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 09:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Too late, someone has deleted your page. Reviews are not appropriate to wikipedia: this is not a site for personal opinions or original research.  regards, TrulyBlue (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Further to your comments on my talk page, you need to understand some things about wikipedia. Firstly, I didn't delete your article, I just tagged it and an WP:administrator agreed with me and deleted it.  Secondly, wikipedia is an encylopedia that contains facts, not opinions.  If a reputable film reviewer says a film is good or bad, that may be notable and deserve a mention on the film's wiki.  I'm afraid you are not (yet) notable or reputable so your opinions are not suitable for incluson in wikipedia.  There are lots of policies that apply to what goes in and what doesn't, and I recommend you take a look at some of them: what wikipedia is NOT; a neutral point of view; and notability.  You will find wikipedia a friendly place if you read the rules, try to obey them, and ask for advice when you think you may need it.  regards, TrulyBlue (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * As I have stated twice before, I did not delete your article, I just tagged it like any other editor can. An Administrator deleted it.  They have the right to do it because (a) they have earned the right through their actions over a long term and other have voted for them, and (b) your article did not meet the criteria for inclusion in wikipedia.  regards, TrulyBlue (talk) 09:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Add one of the speedy deletion templates, if the page satisfies the relevant criterion. See the relevant process TrulyBlue (talk) 11:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Soap character infobox
I think you're referring to the infobox 'soap character'. Easiest way is to look at an existing page with the info you want, for example the source of this page you edited recently.

Drawn Together
Where is your source that there will be a fourth season and a spinoff? Also, there is no character named "Foxxy Lady". It's "Foxxy Love". --Evildevil (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In response to you "working" at RoughDraft studios, I ask this: Where is the source still? I can't take your blind word for things like this. Wikipedia ain't a good source without actually having outside sources. --Evildevil (talk) 06:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Please give me one non-wikipedia link that shows anything you say is true. The chance that you're lying to me seems pretty high. Especially for someone who claims to be "on wikipedia 24/7". --Evildevil (talk) 06:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. You're full of crap. When searching on google, the only thing that "That's Foxxy's Show" and "That's Foxxy Show" is the wikipedia article you started. Don't bother to try to respond to me about that unless you actually have a source. By the way, I work for Viacom. Comedy Central will be shiut down in March, so there's no place for it to air in America... where the talent comes from. --Evildevil (talk) 07:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Know-it-all article...
You're asking my permission for what reason? I'm not an admin. You don't need any permission from me. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't have any powers to grant any sort of permission. I'm just an ordinary Wikipedia editor, like you. Besides, there's no concept of granting permission for such things here. This project must stand or fall on its own merits. Sorry. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * It doesn't work that way! I have no more standing here than you. I cannot give you any sort of permission. Sorry. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Same for me. I have no authority to grant permission to anyone for anything. Quantumobserver (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Scorpion 0422  01:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Scorpion 0422  04:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tariq Aziz. Alexius08 (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by creating fake articles and disturbing order, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you. Alexius08 (talk) 08:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely for vandalism and creating numerous hoax articles. Raul654 (talk) 08:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)