User talk:72.130.112.213

May 2021
Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Saab JAS 39 Gripen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Saab JAS 39 Gripen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello BillCat Why do I need to cite my source when the source is on the page itself. I didn't change any data. All I did was correct the math, and an obvious mistake, or an intentional lie. That's why I provided the numbers I was using in my calculations, to show what I was doing. They were the same numbers, the same data, that were provided in the Wikipedia article.

Update: July 5, 2021 Okay, since you've chosen to ignore me, could you please check the information on at least the top 10 fighter aircraft power to weight ratios? I notice they are very inconsistent. Some power to weight ratio claims are for partially fueled aircraft or fighter aircraft with no weapons, or possibly both. Please come up with a standard method for calculating power to weight ratios, otherwise, it's meaningless and misleading data for the vast majority who are unaware.