User talk:72.142.92.197

April 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Prince Edward Island. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm going to be awake for a couple more hours. How many rounds do you want to go? 72.142.92.197 (talk) 03:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Top Gun: Maverick, you may be blocked from editing. agucova (talk) 04:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm The Night Watch. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Craig Kielburger seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Night Watch    (talk)   20:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:72.142.92.197, you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't care Josh 72.142.92.197 (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:72.142.92.197. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Spencer T• C 20:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 21:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Goldfinch (film).  Mike  Allen   21:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Buck Martinez. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 00:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I added valuable context. 72.142.92.197 (talk) 01:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Raven-Symoné have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 15:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * You're not arguing about accuracy though, are you? 72.142.92.197 (talk) 15:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to That's So Raven. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * What I find interesting is that there are they busy bodies who monitor cruddy Wikipedia articles as if they are noble and virtuous. What you're not doing is looking for a higher standard of writing, thought and quality in the actual articles. If anything it is really difficult to correct really bad pages or those made by the subjects themselves who wish to create a public record that favours them. So Wikipedia remains relatively bad, while the fun stuff with people taking the piss out of the articles get removed. In short you suck! 72.142.92.197 (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm Bowler the Carmine. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sandy McCarthy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bowler the Carmine |  talk  18:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy McCarthy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Bowler the Carmine |  talk  18:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sandy McCarthy, you may be blocked from editing. ''If there is a problem with the article content, you may bring up your concerns at the article's talk page. However, as it stands right now, the information is well-sourced and warranted for inclusion in the article.'' Bowler the Carmine |  talk  18:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)