User talk:72.163.217.104

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Murder of Jessica Lal. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Murder_of_Jessica_Lal&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Captivity of Mangalorean Catholics at Seringapatam. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Captivity_of_Mangalorean_Catholics_at_Seringapatam&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joyson Prabhu Holla at me!   19:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Wireless network, you may be blocked from editing. Dawnseeker2000  23:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Veeraghattam, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Veeraghattam was changed by 72.163.217.104 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852228 on 2012-04-15T18:58:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Polpully has been reverted. Your edit here to Polpully was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://polpullyvela.webs.com/apps/photos/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2012
Hello You re-added the section on India to this page, and deleted the edit note referring people to the guidance that “This page is for instances where the phrase "Big Four" is used of the major banks, AND where the usage can be demonstrated. It is NOT a list of the four largest banks in any particular country, arising from ORIGINAL RESEARCH” So, is it the case in India that "the banking industry is dominated by just four institutions" and that the phrase "Big Four" has "gained currency" to describe them, as the lead paragraph explains? The source you provided doesn’t say this (in fact, it suggests the opposite, that the banking institutions in India are distributed along an exponential curve: the largest is about twice the size of the second largest, which is twice the size of the next two, and so on) What you need is a source (like this one) that shows use of the term and says which they are; do you have a source that says that? Moonraker12 (talk) 11:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User Datagram Protocol without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Talk:Immanuvel Devendrar, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta n   10:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I was not using this laptop then "April 2013". And I am not sure who has done it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.163.217.102 (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 16:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/F1interop solutions Pvt Ltd


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/F1interop solutions Pvt Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. j⚛e deckertalk 16:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UL (safety organization), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Arctic Kangaroo (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 03:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amyra Dastur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. satellizer  (talk  -  contributions)  09:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014
Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to User:KuwarOnline because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I am One of Many (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Yepme because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Keyword-driven testing because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.