User talk:72.183.27.154

Sad, one sided, racist view
Does anyone find it interesting or perhaps peculiar that the entire dialogue of the subject matter (Advisory 1776 Commission) is completely one sided and biased? Is it ridiculous how the commentary addresses none of the embedded subject matter relating to the actual words used by historical US leaders (all of which are easily found in historical documents and citations) and political figures including but not limited to Elizabeth Stanton, the leader of the women civil rights movement in the 1800s, Fredrick Douglass , the foremost black abolitionist leader of the 1800s, Abraham Lincoln , the leader who abolished slavery, Martin Luther King Jr. , the great leader of the equal rights movement in the 1900s. Whoever wrote the commentary describing the Advisory 1776 Commission does a huge disgrace to these great leaders who helped mold the USA into what it is today. Whoever wrote the commentary is obviously racist and probably sexist, having no respect for the trials and tribulations these great leaders experienced to bring liberty and real equality to American citizens. Nor do they give any credence to the diverse group of people who compiled the historical information. It disgusts me how racist and sexist people can be - to not even acknowledge the great feats of the leaders who molded this country into what it is today. MLK gave his life, and some commentator sweeps his accomplishments under the rug as unimportant, typical racist. But regardless of what some racist, sexist, (obviously) left wing commentator will say, the flag of freedom for all peoples, from all religions, from all ethnicities, from all backgrounds, will forever wave for the land of the free and the home of the brave. 72.183.27.154 (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)