User talk:72.187.248.58

Edits to Deborah Frisch
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronnotel 22:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. I don't think it's nonsense, i If there really is a court case, and it's referred to by some reliable secondary source, the information should be in the article.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, there was nonsense added earlier from this IP. Please note WP:BLP in regard adding citations to public records, including court documents.  Specifically: Material from primary sources should be used with care. For example, public records that include personal details such as home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations and home or business addresses should not generally be used. Where a fact has first been presented by a verifiable secondary source, it is acceptable to turn to open records as primary sources to augment the secondary source. Material that is related to their notability, such as court filings of someone notable in part for being involved in legal disputes, are allowable, as are public records such as graduation dates, dates of marriage licenses and the like, where they are publicly available and where that information has first been reported by a verifiable secondary source.
 * &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)