User talk:72.196.125.111

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (72.196.125.111) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 05:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to OpenRCT2 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: OpenRCT2 was changed by 72.196.125.111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919139 on 2017-04-26T06:50:51+00:00.

April 2017
Hello, I'm 80.221.152.17. I noticed that you made a change to an article, YouTube Poop, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include citations that have reliable sources to your information, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 80.221.152.17 (talk) 00:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Toplessness
Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante.

You can make an argument in favor of your proposed change to the article at Talk:Toplessness. In the meantime, do not reimpose the change unless you have a consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Amazon.com, you may be blocked from editing. ''Being reverted means that your removal of sourced content isn't uncontroversial, and that you must discuss it on the talk page of the article and get support from other editors there, before removing it again! And being the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit, does not mean that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia where anyone can do whatever they want.'' - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 23:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Per WP:BRD you must discuss it on the talk page of the article, and get support from other editors for removing it, if you are being reverted, as you have been on Amazon.com, even if you do provide an edit summary. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 09:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Exactly. Thank you, Thomas.W. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

talk:Accelerationism
If there is no response to the thread I've opened on the linked discussion page I will remove the technical tag as unactionable. Lycurgus (talk) 00:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)