User talk:72.2.239.75

April 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Kraken appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- NotC hariza rd 🗨 15:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Harry's House, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.

I think you'll find the sentence in the Rolling Stone review, "Harry's House is bright with synths and horns, often steeped in slick, sticky synth-pop and R&B", is not referring to synth-pop and R&B as "elements" there. Please don't lie about what a source says especially given you added unsourced genres to the article earlier.  Ss  112   04:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, here's a dictionary definition of 'steep in': "If something or someone is steeped in something, they are completely surrounded by or involved in it, or know a lot about it". That's not another way of saying "elements". You are just blatantly lying. I've asked for the article to be protected since you apparently can't grasp what "steeped in" means.  Ss  112   04:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)