User talk:72.224.167.166

January 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Aileen Wuornos, you will be blocked from editing. ''Do not add content without sourcing. Your apologetic additions are not supported by references about this case.'' Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

As the notice above states please stop vandalising the Aileen Wuornos article. We take WP:BLP serious here. You have to have a reliable source to make the statements you are making and none will be found. An administrator has been informed of this activity. Please desist from continuing this, thank you. -- Crohnie Gal Talk  12:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is a discussion about your edits to the Aileen Wuornos article here. Thank you, -- Crohnie Gal  Talk  12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. CIreland (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.