User talk:72.43.48.211

August 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Democrats for Life of America, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 10:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

DFLA
It’s great that you want to add information about DFLA’s conference to the article. It’s important stuff. Every contribution needs to be verifiable and cited, however. You should check out WP:V. If you continue to add material with no citations and revert others, though, you’re going to get blocked. I don’t want to see that happen. There’s a process here we all have to follow. I’d be glad to help you if you like. —Slugger O&#39;Toole (talk) 14:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Don't Stand So Close to Me. - Frood (talk!) 02:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Outhouse, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  15:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm Reify-tech. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from a Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''It is not necessary to use euphemisms or baby-talk in Wikipedia articles. The most important values are clarity and readability, and straightforward language is preferred rather than cuteness and vague indirection.'' Reify-tech (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BiologicalMe (talk) 02:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Slide (baseball), you may be blocked from editing. ✍ A.WagnerC (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * I'm rather late, but that edit wasn't vandalism imo, and I would presume good-faith, although you may argue it was disruptive. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 15:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Finding support for your changes
When adding material to Wikipedia, the burden is upon the editor to support it with a reliable source, and even having a reliable source is not always enough if the changes are tangential or otherwise do not add to the understanding of the subject of an article. If an editor has reverted you, repeating the edit is not appropriate. There are ways of finding support for your position including the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Too many repetitions may be considered edit warring. Please try to understand the reasons why your edits have been reverted and work on gaining consensus before retrying. BiologicalMe (talk) 17:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rest area, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 15:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rest stop. Super Goose 007 ( Honk! ) 15:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Encyclopedic content
I don't believe travelers "| urinating in the woods" at a rest stop is encyclopedic. Kindly, do not add that info again. Thank you! Bingo bro  (Chat)  15:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Old wives' tale, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 02:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of paradoxes, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification 13 July 2020
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/KevinPR82. Thank you. BiologicalMe (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 108.29.171.53 (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.29.171.53 (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.29.171.53 (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Handicap Spot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Isabelle 🔔 01:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mark McGwire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 07:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Substitute administrator requested. Thank you. BiologicalMe (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm MelecieDiancie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Juneteenth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   &#9678;  | melecie |   t  02:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Regarding your edit here to Juneteenth, 1) it's not normal WP practice to introduce new info in the lede. 2) That info was already on the page, 'Calls for further recognition' section. Regards, 220  of  ßorg 03:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Monopoly (1991 video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   Yee no   (talk) 🍁 04:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Juneteenth, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources.  The edit here 220  of  ßorg 06:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Cousin. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 00:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please see a message about editing practices. BiologicalMe (talk) 05:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/KevinPR82. Thank you. BiologicalMe (talk) 17:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop editing while logged out. It is especially inadvisable while there is an active investigation of your editing practices. BiologicalMe (talk) 17:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)