User talk:72.87.183.32

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Special Order 191 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  15:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Special Order 191. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  15:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

3RR Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Special Order 191. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please discuss your proposed changes on the talk page rather than simply reimplementing them. --B (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As soon as your block expired, you reverted the article again with no attempt to discuss the issue. Edit warring is not acceptable behavior.  Please discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page rather than simply reimplementing them. --B (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)