User talk:72bikers

October 2018
To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating your topic ban from WP:ARBGC topics, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
 * Ivanvector, no one is more strict than Drmies (*ahem* *cough*) but in this case I'd like to plead for leniency. 72bikers, if you can PROMISE us you will drop this stick, maybe Ivanvector will consider shortening this block some. Maybe. Drmies (talk) 15:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This was fairly egregious WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT to have gotten WP:BOOMERANG topic banned for it, and then 14 hours later file the exact same request again. I'm surprised he didn't get a longer block. Would have to be quite an impressive response imo. -Obsidi (talk) 17:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Obsidi why am I suppose to care what you think? As you have never had any interaction with me, you are clearly here to instigate, how childish. A difference of opinion can be expressed in a polite manner. There is no acceptable excuse for being rude. -72bikers (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Motorcyclist Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Motorcyclist Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 * 72bikers, I don't know what you are trying to accomplish with all this. Maybe you're blowing off steam, I don't know, but this isn't going to go anywhere, at least not some place good. Reconsider, please. Drmies (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

rip
thats sad. i looked at a lot of of drama surrounding 72biker until just now finding out he was doing a bamboozle. Wikipedia feels like the world's largest book with very rich history. it feels like a legitimate story with plot (although very abstract and weird) now if only there was a social platform like this that wasn't based off of the creation of NPOV Articles.. not that the idea isn't amazing because wikipedia feels like the most vast source of information and the vast majority of information comes from freelancers with only a piece of the truth. But together these pieces make the full puzzle! Elitematterman (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)