User talk:73.109.52.94

January 2018
Hello, I'm RockMagnetist. Your recent edit to the page Linus Pauling appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RockMagnetist(talk) 04:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Schematic
Please stop removing material that is relevant to the subject in favor of a narrow focus on a specific aspect of the topic. I've opened a discussion on the talkpage, and I've semi-protected the article to ensure that you come there to present arguments for your edits.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * And while we're at it, what does the "or technical" interjection add to the caption at Djehutihotep?  Acroterion   (talk)   02:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Technically, this is not a schematic at all. It's actually "technical drawing" diagram. A schematic is a very modern form diagramming standardized by most engineering associations. Associations generally require the use of specified line-art symbols, which this document does not adhere to - nor does it provide the same function as a schematic.

A schematic is a very specific form of diagramming that eliminates the use of artwork and colors so it may fit on small documents. A diagram provided in a technical document does not have these restraints and is closer to what this actually is. 02:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * You're presenting a very narrow view of the topic, which isn't consistent with usage in the world at large. "Schematics" present a simplified overview of a system, design or network in an easily-understandable form, often as a preliminary essay to establish the concept and to express it in a concise manner. The usage is not, as you argue, limited to engineering, notr to small document formats. The London Underground diagram is a schematic representation of the system, edited for readability. A schematic in architecture (I'm an architect, by the way) is a concise representation of the design on one sheet. That format can be small or large, and there is no formal requirement for its presentation. What counts is the concision and readability of the presentation. In electrical engineering, there is a differing concept that closely approximates your description. However, "small" is often a relative term, and a system schematic for complex engineering systems can be quite large.   Acroterion   (talk)   03:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * In any case, the place to discuss is at Talk:Schematic. Please bring sources for any proposed edits.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Dimick (February 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dennis Dimick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dennis Dimick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dennis_Dimick Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dennis_Dimick reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SITH   (talk)   21:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Dimick (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dennis Dimick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dennis Dimick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dennis_Dimick Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dennis_Dimick reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dennis Dimick concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dennis Dimick, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dennis Dimick


Hello, 73.109.52.94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dennis Dimick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)