User talk:73.111.34.123

July 2017
Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of Patriarchs of the Church of the East— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Theistic evolution, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  - 18:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Acts of Paul and Thecla‎. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (73.111.34.123) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Sondra.kinsey (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New Testament apocrypha, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't see a reason for 73.111.34.123's edit to New Testament apocrypha. However, at a glance, this user's contribution history seems like well-intentioned efforts to improve Wikipedia. This seems like a questionable edit without an edit summary and normal disagreement among editors. I don't think it's appropriate to call it disruptive editing or warrants a level 3 warning. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I agree that it does not warrant a level three warning so I am striking it. While over 99% of the time, in my opinion, Huggle delivers an appropriate warning, it does not show the level that it adds. In rare cases, and this appears to be one of them, a much more mild comment would be appropriate but one would not know that without spending considerable time double-checking. Unless an editor is leaving a bad faith message, I almost always fail to strike a warning when the editor replies to me with a good faith rationale, even if I don't agree with it. If it is a technical problem, I try to point out to the editor how to make the technical fix or refer to appropriate Wikipedia help pages. I hesitate to write "always" because with the number of edits I have made, I suppose one could find an exception. Donner60 (talk) 02:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Thomas the Apostle
3 Do you have a citation to support this edit to Thomas the Apostle? I am surprised by the removal and significant change without adding a new source. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, I do actually. http://seanmcdowell.org/blog/did-the-apostle-thomas-die-as-a-martyr -73.111.34.123
 * I do not see anything in that source to support your claim that the Acts of Thomas was widely read. In any case, your edit has already been reverted. Please be sure to cite sources for your edits, or they will most likely be removed. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 00:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)