User talk:73.135.192.206

Wal Al Bara

 * 1) 1 Stop calling people upon the sunnah Wahhabi's this is incorrect, Ibn Abdul Wahhaab was Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb was raised in a family of scholars and judges. His father was a leading judge (qādhī) as was his grandfather and he studied under his paternal uncle who was a scholar also. Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb memorized the Qurān before the age of ten. He went on to study Quranic commentary, hadīth literature and hadīth science, jurisprudence and the rest of the Islamic sciences, so much so that his father would seek his opinions on religious subjects. He studied in the centres of Islamic learning in Madīnah and Basrah in Irāq under notable scholars of the time. Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb  wrote and strived to convince people against false practices that were foreign to the Islāmic teachings contained in the Qurān and Prophetic Sunnah.

Therefore, Ibn Adbdul Wahaab followed the Sunnah which is comprised of Quran and Hadeeth(authentic narrations) from the Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salaam. He conveyed the message, where others water down the religion giving opinions not based on facts, never mentioning the foundations of tawhid and its principles. Scholars like him wrote books explaining the foundations of tawhid using ayah (proofs) from Quran and narrations of our Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salaam. Quran and Sunnah was already established/revealed he was simply explaining it to the layman/common folk!

Those who try to use the teachings of Shaikh Muhammad bin ʿAbdul-Wahhāb to justify rebellion against the tyrannical rulers also have no real basis. They misconstrue the words of the Shaikh, utilizing ambiguous speech whilst ignoring his categorical statements. Presented here is just one of many clear statements of Shaikh Muhammad Ibn ʿAbdul-Wahhāb from his creed and open letter to the people and scholars of the town of al-Qasīm in which he states without ambiguity:

“And I hold the obligation of listening to and obeying the Muslim rulers, whether they be righteous or sinful, so long as they do not command disobedience to Allāh. Whoever takes hold of the Caliphate (rulership), the people gather behind him and are pleased with him – or if he has overpowered them with [the might of] his sword up until he becomes the Caliph, [even then] obedience is obligatory to him and it is not permissible to revolt against him.” [4]

Shaikh al-Fawzān, a Salafi scholar of our times, comments upon this saying: “So it obligatory to obey the rulers and if they command with sin, then, ‘There is no obedience to the creation in disobedience to the Creator.’ [5] However, you cannot renounce your pledge of allegiance to them if they command you with sin. We do not obey them in sin but obedience remains in that which is good…” [6]

Muslims upon the Sunnah who study the religion know its no permissible to over-throw the Muslim ruler (like they do in Afghanistan and other places), or protest (like in Iran), or backbite the Muslim rule, those who do so are innovators and Wal Al Bara is to be shown to them for example boycott them, do not sit with them or attend any of their gatherings, we (meaning Muslims upon the Sunnah) oppose them. Muhammad sallahu alyhi wa salam dealt with groups like ISIS in his day we call the Khawarij, upon Khawariji methodology who are involved in over-throwing Muslim rulers and killing innocent ppl. Please get your facts stright.

Please educate yourself before posting things that are not accurate because then its a lie!*Part 1. Kitāb at-Tawhīd: An amazing authorship and journey into the history of

https://abukhadeejah.com/did-shaikh-muhammad-bin-%ca%bfabdul-wahhab-rebel-the-first-saudi-state/
 * Did Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdul-Wahhāb rebel? The First Saudi State

https://abukhadeejah.com/methodology-of-the-radicals-vs-the-methodology-of-the-prophets/ Aminah Salalfi (talk) 22:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Methodology Of The Radicals Versus The Methodology Of The Prophets